July 14, 2007

BOBJ Inxight insights

When a company announces an acquisition, it usually does a round of limited-content briefings, in no small part because the antitrust lawyers won’t let them do anything else. Once the deal closes, antitrust restrictions are lifted, and they do another round of briefings. These, typically, are vague and platitudinous.

Business Objects/Inxight have now reached that point. Even so, my briefing yesterday had some aspects worth writing up.

They are strong and convincing on the claim that Inxight’s OEM business will continue to be an area of emphasis, even when selling to BOBJ competitors. Specifically:

Actually, there are a lot more than two product lines. E.g., there’s visualization technology from both sides of the merger. So some real synergies may actually exist. Also, there are some ISVs who OEM a full BI product suite, so to the extent general product line integration works in the enterprise market, it could work well in the indirect channel as well.

Their vision for text analytics integrated into business intelligence is airy and obvious, with lots of emphasis on the distinction between “structured” and “unstructured” data, and how great it will be to combine them. To their credit, they mercifully skipped the standard Gartner quote about 85% or so of data being unstructured, but otherwise I think they touched on most or all of the standard platitudes. (At least, they did in their slides. I asked for the slides in advance, and then strongly requested they NOT take me through the deck in the actual briefing. They obliged very nicely.)

In the early interest from existing BOBJ customers, there’s no particular pattern to the types of text analytics application or use envisioned.

Inxight’s classified Federal-business subsidiary will be left standalone, with the obvious intent of having it be affected as little as possible by this merger.

They seem serious about properly productizing Inxight’s visualization technology, which currently is a grab-bag of SDKs. This would include a set of core capabilities, database schemas that are straightforward to populate, and so on. And this would of course be packaged with other snazzy visualization technologies such as Crystal Excelsius.

Inxight seems to have had three primary visualization “products”, namely:

As a general rule – perhaps because of the programming required to implement them – these visualization products tend to be deployed for very specific applications. Naturally, it is BOBJ’s hope to get them used in broader enterprise deployments.

We also talked about Inxight’s federated search product Awareness Server. Frankly, that discussion was pretty confused. They asserted that this was an IDD (Information Discovery and Display – i.e., BI) product, while classic text analytic information extraction was more EIM (Enterprise Information and Management – i.e., ETL). I guess that’s because it fetches information and displays it directly, as a query tool does, while information extraction merely stages information into a database for future querying.

The problem with federated search as a product is that it’s directly competitive with what focused search engines do. Leading relational DBMS formally have federated search capabilities, but almost nobody ever uses them; instead, the data they index is the data they actually manage. Search engines, on the other hand, VERY commonly index documents they aren’t responsible for directly managing. Thus, Awareness Server competes directly with Google OneBox, FAST, et al. And while I forgot to probe for feature/function details, I’d be surprised to discover that Awareness Server is truly competitive with the much more popular and mature alternatives.


2 Responses to “BOBJ Inxight insights”

  1. Ross on July 16th, 2007 9:39 pm

    Regarding your last paragraph about search solutions, Inxight promotes a solution that is an add-on to the Google solution, so I don’t think they try to compete with them.

  2. Curt Monash on July 20th, 2007 2:50 am

    My point is that the major enterprise search engines generally have federated search built in. So it’s not clear to me what Inxight offers that they don’t.

Leave a Reply

Feed including blog about text analytics, text mining, and text search Subscribe to the Monash Research feed via RSS or email:


Search our blogs and white papers

Monash Research blogs

User consulting

Building a short list? Refining your strategic plan? We can help.

Vendor advisory

We tell vendors what's happening -- and, more important, what they should do about it.

Monash Research highlights

Learn about white papers, webcasts, and blog highlights, by RSS or email.