<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Text Technologies &#187; Endeca</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/category/vendors/endeca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com</link>
	<description>Understanding technology ... in both senses of the phrase</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:02:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The case for Inxight Awareness Server</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/08/03/the-case-for-inxight-awareness-server/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/08/03/the-case-for-inxight-awareness-server/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 03:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BI integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Objects and Inxight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endeca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/08/03/the-case-for-inxight-awareness-server/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been pretty skeptical about Inxight&#8217;s Awareness Server. My theory is that ordinary enterprise search engines can index remotely anyway, and they offer much better search functionality. Inxight&#8217;s Ian Hersey was kind enough to write in and offer two counter-arguments. First, Ian points out that there are circumstances when, due to security and permissions, you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been pretty <a href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/23/a-little-more-on-business-objectsinxight/" >skeptical</a> about Inxight&#8217;s Awareness Server.  My theory is that ordinary enterprise search engines can index remotely anyway, and they offer much better search functionality.  Inxight&#8217;s Ian Hersey was kind enough to write in and offer two counter-arguments.</p>
<p>First, Ian points out that there are circumstances when, due to security and permissions,  you can&#8217;t really index everything via one search engine.  Specifically, he offers the government as an example.   OK, I can see that in the government, with its classified and/or regulated silos.  However, I have trouble thinking of many more examples.  While there certainly are plenty of instances where a variety of organizations share information on a somewhat arms-length basis, it&#8217;s tough to think of such cases where federated text search would come into play.</p>
<p>Second, Ian in essence disputes my claim of inferior functionality.   While implicitly conceding &#8212; as well he should! &#8212; that Inxight&#8217;s Awareness Server doesn&#8217;t do some things full-featured search engines do, he points out analytic features that may not be found in conventional search engine offering.  The big one he calls out is faceted search &#8212; which of course was the core of Intelliseek, the acquisition Awareness Server came from.   Hmm.   Faceted search has a checkered history, with Excite and Northern Light being perhaps the most visible among many failures.  On the other hand, it&#8217;s a great idea that keeps being tried, and some versions &#8212; notably Endeca&#8217;s &#8212; have turned out well.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;ll have to reserve judgment on that part until I look at Inxight&#8217;s product and see what they do and don&#8217;t actually have.</p>
<p><em> </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/08/03/the-case-for-inxight-awareness-server/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Huge e-commerce gains claimed by everybody</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/01/huge-e-commerce-gains-claimed-by-everybody/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/01/huge-e-commerce-gains-claimed-by-everybody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 11:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Baynote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endeca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InQuira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progress and EasyAsk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Structured search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/01/huge-e-commerce-gains-claimed-by-everybody/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The folks at Progress claim huge conversion rate benefits to EasyAsk, although unfortunately so far I&#8217;ve been unable to drill down and see what those numbers really mean. (Flagship customer = Land&#8217;s End.) Baynote makes more modest but still large claims. (Flagship customer = no big names that I&#8217;m aware of.) Endeca is clearly the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The folks at Progress claim <a href="http://www.easyask.com/about_us/news/press/pressitem/pressrelease_951672/index.ssp" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.easyask.com');">huge conversion rate benefits to EasyAsk</a>, although unfortunately so far I&#8217;ve been unable to drill down and see what those numbers really mean.  (Flagship customer = Land&#8217;s End.)   Baynote makes more modest but <a href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/04/30/baynote-buzzwords/" >still large</a> claims.  (Flagship customer = no big names that I&#8217;m aware of.)     Endeca is clearly the market leader.  (Flagship customers = Wal-Mart, Home Depot.)  <a href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/02/15/inquira-mercado-structured-search/" >Mercado and Inquira</a> are important players, at least in certain verticals.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s safe to say that e-commerce site navigation aids constitute a really important product category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/01/huge-e-commerce-gains-claimed-by-everybody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

