<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Text Technologies &#187; Baynote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/category/vendors/baynote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com</link>
	<description>Understanding technology ... in both senses of the phrase</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:02:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Huge e-commerce gains claimed by everybody</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/01/huge-e-commerce-gains-claimed-by-everybody/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/01/huge-e-commerce-gains-claimed-by-everybody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 11:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Baynote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endeca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InQuira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progress and EasyAsk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Structured search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/01/huge-e-commerce-gains-claimed-by-everybody/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The folks at Progress claim huge conversion rate benefits to EasyAsk, although unfortunately so far I&#8217;ve been unable to drill down and see what those numbers really mean. (Flagship customer = Land&#8217;s End.) Baynote makes more modest but still large claims. (Flagship customer = no big names that I&#8217;m aware of.) Endeca is clearly the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The folks at Progress claim <a href="http://www.easyask.com/about_us/news/press/pressitem/pressrelease_951672/index.ssp" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.easyask.com');">huge conversion rate benefits to EasyAsk</a>, although unfortunately so far I&#8217;ve been unable to drill down and see what those numbers really mean.  (Flagship customer = Land&#8217;s End.)   Baynote makes more modest but <a href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/04/30/baynote-buzzwords/" >still large</a> claims.  (Flagship customer = no big names that I&#8217;m aware of.)     Endeca is clearly the market leader.  (Flagship customers = Wal-Mart, Home Depot.)  <a href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/02/15/inquira-mercado-structured-search/" >Mercado and Inquira</a> are important players, at least in certain verticals.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s safe to say that e-commerce site navigation aids constitute a really important product category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/01/huge-e-commerce-gains-claimed-by-everybody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wise Crowds of Long-Tailed Ants, or something like that</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/04/30/baynote-buzzwords/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/04/30/baynote-buzzwords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 02:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Baynote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search engine optimization (SEO)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social software and online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software as a Service (SaaS)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specialized search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/04/30/baynote-buzzwords/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Baynote sells a recommendation engine whose motto appears to be “popularity implies accuracy.” While that leads to some interesting technological ideas (below), Baynote carries that principle to an unfortunate extreme in its marketing, which is jam-packed with inaccurate buzzspeak. While most of that is focused on a few trendy meme-oriented books, the low point of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Baynote sells a recommendation engine whose motto appears to be “popularity implies accuracy.”<span> </span>While that leads to some interesting technological ideas (below), Baynote carries that principle to an unfortunate extreme in its marketing, which is jam-packed with inaccurate buzzspeak.<span> </span>While most of that is focused on a few trendy meme-oriented books, the low point of my briefing today was the probably the insistence against pushback that “95%” of Google’s results depend on “PageRank.” <span> </span>(I think what Baynote really meant is “all off-page factors combined,” but anyhow I sure didn’t get the sense that accuracy was an important metric for them in setting their briefing strategy.<span> </span>And by the way, one reason I repeat the company’s name rather than referring to Baynote by a pronoun is that on-page factors DO matter in search engine rankings.)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">That said, here’s the essence of Baynote’s story, as best I could figure it out. <span id="more-105"></span></p>
<ul style="margin-top: 0in" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal">Baynote’s secret sauce is      a set of 20+ behavioral metrics to identify whether, if somebody clicks on      a page, they are SATISFIED with the content.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Based on that, Baynote      provides a “content recommendation” engine. (For now, the distinction      between “content” and “web page” is not important, but the concepts are in      my opinion diverging over time.) <span> </span>This      is manifested in two forms (a typical installation uses both).<span> </span>One is just a list of      recommendations.<span> </span>The other is in a      search engine – “social search” with an “implicit folksonomy” &#8212; and its      results pages.<span> </span>Both sit on web      pages as boxes/widgets.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Baynote’s first markets were online support and eMarketing.  The company is now rolling out eCommerce as well.   I didn’t get clarity about what was      different in the nature of the recommendations, if anything, that      underlies any small separation between these apps.<span> </span>(Baynote was clear about saying that the      differences were indeed small.)</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">The whole thing is SaaS,      built on a LAMP stack.  MySQL      4.something seems to suffice, which makes sense given that Baynote’s      system is not handling any significant transactions directly.<span> </span>That said, I didn’t push to understand      what it means for a search engine to be built on MySQL.<span> </span>This wasn’t the kind of conversation in      which one could elicit substantive detail.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Baynote claims that a      sample size of as few as 7-10 visitors liking a particular piece of      content suffices to provide a good basis for predicting who else will like      it.<span> </span>I’m not in a position to assess      the credibility or, more to the point, limitations of this claim.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Baynote has the philosophy      that they try to watch a user’s behavior on a site and map that to a “context.”<span> </span>I like that approach.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">The company cites tested      stats of 20% net lift (revenue increase), with 50% of sales being touched      by its recommendations.<span> </span>Those      numbers don’t sound terribly impressive, perhaps unless they’re truly      additive to those provided by, say, Endeca, which is an announced partner.</li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em> </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/04/30/baynote-buzzwords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

