<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consumer Reports + National Enquirer + ? = the future of free societies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2009/05/08/consumer-reports-national-enquirer-the-future-of-free-societies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2009/05/08/consumer-reports-national-enquirer-the-future-of-free-societies/</link>
	<description>Understanding technology ... in both senses of the phrase</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 05:45:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch offers to pay a source&#8217;s legal expenses &#124; Text Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2009/05/08/consumer-reports-national-enquirer-the-future-of-free-societies/comment-page-1/#comment-98545</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch offers to pay a source&#8217;s legal expenses &#124; Text Technologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 21:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/?p=324#comment-98545</guid>
		<description>[...] That&#8217;s a remarkable offer to make, one that I don&#8217;t ever recall hearing the mainstream media ever matching. As such, it&#8217;s a strong (albeit very partial) answer to the ongoing handwringing about the future of investigative journalism. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That&#8217;s a remarkable offer to make, one that I don&#8217;t ever recall hearing the mainstream media ever matching. As such, it&#8217;s a strong (albeit very partial) answer to the ongoing handwringing about the future of investigative journalism. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Monash</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2009/05/08/consumer-reports-national-enquirer-the-future-of-free-societies/comment-page-1/#comment-92466</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 07:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/?p=324#comment-92466</guid>
		<description>Publicity is something that happens to real or imagined news -- or, if you like, to the subjects of such real or imagined news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Publicity is something that happens to real or imagined news &#8212; or, if you like, to the subjects of such real or imagined news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Barlow</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2009/05/08/consumer-reports-national-enquirer-the-future-of-free-societies/comment-page-1/#comment-92402</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Barlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 04:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/?p=324#comment-92402</guid>
		<description>&quot;a significant fraction of news is something large organizations have a vested interest in releasing&quot;

Is that news or is it publicity?  Depends on the circumstances.  Certainly there is plenty of what I might call news that orgs do *not* have a vested interest in releasing (although they might have a vested interest in not covering it up).

I agree that the predicted death of traditional journalism could lead to a cut-back well-sourced, thoroughly researched investigative reporting.  Indeed, there is already a trend on the web to accept poorly-sourced stories as fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;a significant fraction of news is something large organizations have a vested interest in releasing&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that news or is it publicity?  Depends on the circumstances.  Certainly there is plenty of what I might call news that orgs do *not* have a vested interest in releasing (although they might have a vested interest in not covering it up).</p>
<p>I agree that the predicted death of traditional journalism could lead to a cut-back well-sourced, thoroughly researched investigative reporting.  Indeed, there is already a trend on the web to accept poorly-sourced stories as fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.170 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-01-24 03:55:43 -->
