<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How good does e-discovery search need to be?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/09/01/how-good-does-e-discovery-search-need-to-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/09/01/how-good-does-e-discovery-search-need-to-be/</link>
	<description>Understanding technology ... in both senses of the phrase</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:21:09 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Quick Bites: E-Discovery and Transparency</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/09/01/how-good-does-e-discovery-search-need-to-be/#comment-50557</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick Bites: E-Discovery and Transparency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/?p=277#comment-50557</guid>
		<description>[...] just read an article on how courts will tolerate search inaccuracies in e-Discovery by way of Curt Monash. It reminded me of our recent discussion of transparency in information retrieval. I agree that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just read an article on how courts will tolerate search inaccuracies in e-Discovery by way of Curt Monash. It reminded me of our recent discussion of transparency in information retrieval. I agree that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
