<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mark Logic viewed as a different kind of text search technology vendor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/04/29/mark-logic-viewed-as-a-different-kind-of-text-search-technology-vendor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/04/29/mark-logic-viewed-as-a-different-kind-of-text-search-technology-vendor/</link>
	<description>Understanding technology ... in both senses of the phrase</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 05:12:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Open issues in database and analytic technology &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/04/29/mark-logic-viewed-as-a-different-kind-of-text-search-technology-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-171542</link>
		<dc:creator>Open issues in database and analytic technology &#124; DBMS2 -- DataBase Management System Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/?p=217#comment-171542</guid>
		<description>[...] the same league as application development over relational DBMS. The choices are mainly XML (e.g., MarkLogic), SQL for text integrated into RDBMS (limited by the weakness of those integrations), and something [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the same league as application development over relational DBMS. The choices are mainly XML (e.g., MarkLogic), SQL for text integrated into RDBMS (limited by the weakness of those integrations), and something [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Monash</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/04/29/mark-logic-viewed-as-a-different-kind-of-text-search-technology-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-39086</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 03:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/?p=217#comment-39086</guid>
		<description>Dan,

At the time Object Design/Excelon hadn&#039;t yet been bought by Progress, Oracle&#039;s and IBM&#039;s XML support were rudimentary indeed.  Anyhow, it all comes down to what kinds of XML management you need to do.  Most XML is either lightly transformed relational data or lightly transformed text data.  Accordingly, most XML management is either decently handled by RDBMS, or else is done in a text search context.

As you know, I&#039;ve been writing about all this over on DBMS2.

Best,

CAM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>At the time Object Design/Excelon hadn&#8217;t yet been bought by Progress, Oracle&#8217;s and IBM&#8217;s XML support were rudimentary indeed.  Anyhow, it all comes down to what kinds of XML management you need to do.  Most XML is either lightly transformed relational data or lightly transformed text data.  Accordingly, most XML management is either decently handled by RDBMS, or else is done in a text search context.</p>
<p>As you know, I&#8217;ve been writing about all this over on DBMS2.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>CAM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Weinreb</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/04/29/mark-logic-viewed-as-a-different-kind-of-text-search-technology-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-39037</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Weinreb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/?p=217#comment-39037</guid>
		<description>At eXcelon (the second startup that I co-founded), we tried to do an XML DBMS product.  Admittedly the company marketed it very poorly.  Nevertheless, it&#039;s a hard product to sell.  The problem is that Oracle and other RDBMS companies (I think IBM&#039;s DB/2) have XML features that most users find pretty attractive.  And most users are much happier buying a database management system from one of the big vendors.  I wish Mark Logic all the luck in the world, though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At eXcelon (the second startup that I co-founded), we tried to do an XML DBMS product.  Admittedly the company marketed it very poorly.  Nevertheless, it&#8217;s a hard product to sell.  The problem is that Oracle and other RDBMS companies (I think IBM&#8217;s DB/2) have XML features that most users find pretty attractive.  And most users are much happier buying a database management system from one of the big vendors.  I wish Mark Logic all the luck in the world, though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Mark Logic story in XML database management</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/04/29/mark-logic-viewed-as-a-different-kind-of-text-search-technology-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-38573</link>
		<dc:creator>DBMS2 &#8212; DataBase Management System Services &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Mark Logic story in XML database management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/?p=217#comment-38573</guid>
		<description>[...] A companion post over on Text Technologies takes a text search view of MarkLogic. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A companion post over on Text Technologies takes a text search view of MarkLogic. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.228 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-02-04 17:14:43 -->
