<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google could dominate single-site search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/03/05/google-could-dominate-single-site-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/03/05/google-could-dominate-single-site-search/</link>
	<description>Understanding technology ... in both senses of the phrase</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:21:09 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Javier</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/03/05/google-could-dominate-single-site-search/#comment-36689</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/03/05/google-could-dominate-single-site-search/#comment-36689</guid>
		<description>Seems pretty cool. I wonder if Google will kick some adsense revenue from the ads on the second search page to sites with heavy second box search traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems pretty cool. I wonder if Google will kick some adsense revenue from the ads on the second search page to sites with heavy second box search traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/03/05/google-could-dominate-single-site-search/#comment-36626</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/03/05/google-could-dominate-single-site-search/#comment-36626</guid>
		<description>I assume you know the Times only just got to this. Also interesting to see you can get yourself removed.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/24/business/media/24ecom.html?em&amp;ex=1206504000&amp;en=7af4252e4367999c&amp;ei=5087%0A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume you know the Times only just got to this. Also interesting to see you can get yourself removed.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/24/business/media/24ecom.html?em&amp;ex=1206504000&amp;en=7af4252e4367999c&amp;ei=5087" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.nytimes.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/24/business/media/24ecom.html?em&amp;ex=1206504000&amp;en=7af4252e4367999c&amp;ei=5087</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Burke</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/03/05/google-could-dominate-single-site-search/#comment-35794</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/03/05/google-could-dominate-single-site-search/#comment-35794</guid>
		<description>We wrote an article on this very same new arrival!

The Team
http://iserviceshop.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-secondary-google-search-box-shows.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We wrote an article on this very same new arrival!</p>
<p>The Team<br />
<a href="http://iserviceshop.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-secondary-google-search-box-shows.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/iserviceshop.blogspot.com');" rel="nofollow">http://iserviceshop.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-secondary-google-search-box-shows.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lux</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/03/05/google-could-dominate-single-site-search/#comment-35558</link>
		<dc:creator>Lux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 03:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/03/05/google-could-dominate-single-site-search/#comment-35558</guid>
		<description>Their market share on search is so big now that Google needs to find new ways to keep users within the &quot;Googleverse&quot; of their own ad inventory (aka content). Keeping users on a Google search results page, instead of handing them off to Amazon, is just one way of doing that.

Google Knols is similar -- why hand off traffic to Wikipedia if you can serve similar information on a Google-controlled page? 

I&#039;m sure we&#039;ll see more projects like these from Google as time goes on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their market share on search is so big now that Google needs to find new ways to keep users within the &#8220;Googleverse&#8221; of their own ad inventory (aka content). Keeping users on a Google search results page, instead of handing them off to Amazon, is just one way of doing that.</p>
<p>Google Knols is similar &#8212; why hand off traffic to Wikipedia if you can serve similar information on a Google-controlled page? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll see more projects like these from Google as time goes on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
