<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sturgeon&#8217;s Law, and the future technology of social technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/02/05/sturgeon-law-future-social-networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/02/05/sturgeon-law-future-social-networking/</link>
	<description>Understanding technology ... in both senses of the phrase</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Enterprise Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/02/05/sturgeon-law-future-social-networking/#comment-33303</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Enterprise Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/02/05/sturgeon-law-future-social-networking/#comment-33303</guid>
		<description>[...] the messaging and office productivity software vendors don&#8217;t provide filter-rich Enterprise Twitter, somebody else most likely [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the messaging and office productivity software vendors don&#8217;t provide filter-rich Enterprise Twitter, somebody else most likely [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Monash</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/02/05/sturgeon-law-future-social-networking/#comment-33271</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 05:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/02/05/sturgeon-law-future-social-networking/#comment-33271</guid>
		<description>Bob,

I'm not sure the precise number in Sturgeon's Law has been empirically tested. :)

Right now, I'd say that I care about a lot less than 10% of my Twitter tweetstream. A LOT less.  Fortunately, I skim quickly.

CAM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure the precise number in Sturgeon&#8217;s Law has been empirically tested. <img src='http://www.texttechnologies.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Right now, I&#8217;d say that I care about a lot less than 10% of my Twitter tweetstream. A LOT less.  Fortunately, I skim quickly.</p>
<p>CAM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Sawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/02/05/sturgeon-law-future-social-networking/#comment-33252</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Sawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/02/05/sturgeon-law-future-social-networking/#comment-33252</guid>
		<description>While I agree with the need for data management and powerful searching capabilities, let me offer a slightly different perspective, starting with a corollary of Sturgeon's Law: 10% of everything is good.  In a lot of areas, such as social networking, "wildcat" oil drilling and sales, batting .100 is very respectable.  If you find your batting average is above .100, the smart thing to do is find more chances to swing.  Repetitions of "Hi! How is everyone?" may appear devoid of useful information, but I'll bet a sociologist could write a term paper if not a thesis on what they say about a community; that may explain why millions of people don't flee in disgust.  Finally, there surely are people who insist upon a much higher batting average, but I contend those are not the people who use social networking technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with the need for data management and powerful searching capabilities, let me offer a slightly different perspective, starting with a corollary of Sturgeon&#8217;s Law: 10% of everything is good.  In a lot of areas, such as social networking, &#8220;wildcat&#8221; oil drilling and sales, batting .100 is very respectable.  If you find your batting average is above .100, the smart thing to do is find more chances to swing.  Repetitions of &#8220;Hi! How is everyone?&#8221; may appear devoid of useful information, but I&#8217;ll bet a sociologist could write a term paper if not a thesis on what they say about a community; that may explain why millions of people don&#8217;t flee in disgust.  Finally, there surely are people who insist upon a much higher batting average, but I contend those are not the people who use social networking technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hambly</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/02/05/sturgeon-law-future-social-networking/#comment-32757</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hambly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/02/05/sturgeon-law-future-social-networking/#comment-32757</guid>
		<description>Really good read and I'm with you on the concept of Data Management Challenge.

This is a really timely post as I see three related posts now inside 10 mins or so. I made a comparison about Social Media being a Mafia Mentality this morning see here:

http://www.chrishambly.com/content/social-media-based-mafia-mentality

That post picked up Laura-Jane Filotrani who posts for the guardian:

https://blogs.guardian.co.uk/money/2008/02/its_all_about_the_connections.html

All very related posts I thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really good read and I&#8217;m with you on the concept of Data Management Challenge.</p>
<p>This is a really timely post as I see three related posts now inside 10 mins or so. I made a comparison about Social Media being a Mafia Mentality this morning see here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chrishambly.com/content/social-media-based-mafia-mentality" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.chrishambly.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.chrishambly.com/content/social-media-based-mafia-mentality</a></p>
<p>That post picked up Laura-Jane Filotrani who posts for the guardian:</p>
<p><a href="https://blogs.guardian.co.uk/money/2008/02/its_all_about_the_connections.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/blogs.guardian.co.uk');" rel="nofollow">https://blogs.guardian.co.uk/money/2008/02/its_all_about_the_connections.html</a></p>
<p>All very related posts I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.149 seconds -->
