<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google is putting more emphasis on phrases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/18/google-is-putting-more-emphasis-on-phrases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/18/google-is-putting-more-emphasis-on-phrases/</link>
	<description>Understanding technology ... in both senses of the phrase</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Misc Ramblings and Link Love - 25 Jan 08</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/18/google-is-putting-more-emphasis-on-phrases/#comment-31798</link>
		<dc:creator>Misc Ramblings and Link Love - 25 Jan 08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/18/google-is-putting-more-emphasis-on-phrases/#comment-31798</guid>
		<description>[...] Technologies posted a great article on how google is emhpasizing on phrases within the text or the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Technologies posted a great article on how google is emhpasizing on phrases within the text or the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Monash</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/18/google-is-putting-more-emphasis-on-phrases/#comment-31358</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/18/google-is-putting-more-emphasis-on-phrases/#comment-31358</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jay.  That would help explain the asymmetry between the treatment of AND and OR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jay.  That would help explain the asymmetry between the treatment of AND and OR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Levitt</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/18/google-is-putting-more-emphasis-on-phrases/#comment-31347</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Levitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/18/google-is-putting-more-emphasis-on-phrases/#comment-31347</guid>
		<description>Google has always said that "or", as a lower-case word, is a search term, and that "OR", as a capitalized word, is the boolean-or search operator.

I think "or" in lower case used to be a stopword, rather than a true search term, but now I can't remember.  It never functioned as an operator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has always said that &#8220;or&#8221;, as a lower-case word, is a search term, and that &#8220;OR&#8221;, as a capitalized word, is the boolean-or search operator.</p>
<p>I think &#8220;or&#8221; in lower case used to be a stopword, rather than a true search term, but now I can&#8217;t remember.  It never functioned as an operator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.135 seconds -->
