<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A claim that Google is doing pretty detailed extraction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/12/google-detailed-extraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/12/google-detailed-extraction/</link>
	<description>Understanding technology ... in both senses of the phrase</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:11:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; An interesting Matt Cutts interview from December</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/12/google-detailed-extraction/#comment-31043</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; An interesting Matt Cutts interview from December</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/12/google-detailed-extraction/#comment-31043</guid>
		<description>[...] I noted recently, Google seems to have a lot of heuristics for identifying particular types of pages. In this interview, the example was that a page that would otherwise seem spammy because it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I noted recently, Google seems to have a lot of heuristics for identifying particular types of pages. In this interview, the example was that a page that would otherwise seem spammy because it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

