<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft is buying FAST; what about FAST&#8217;s contractual prohibition?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/08/microsoft-fast-prohibition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/08/microsoft-fast-prohibition/</link>
	<description>Understanding technology ... in both senses of the phrase</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:11:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Implications of Microsoft&#8217;s bid for Yahoo</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/08/microsoft-fast-prohibition/#comment-32426</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Implications of Microsoft&#8217;s bid for Yahoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/08/microsoft-fast-prohibition/#comment-32426</guid>
		<description>[...] will recombine both parts of the old FAST/alltheweb.com Therefore, Microsoft will be able to use the same technology for web and enterprise search, to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will recombine both parts of the old FAST/alltheweb.com Therefore, Microsoft will be able to use the same technology for web and enterprise search, to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; More on Microsoft in enterprise search</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/08/microsoft-fast-prohibition/#comment-30696</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; More on Microsoft in enterprise search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/08/microsoft-fast-prohibition/#comment-30696</guid>
		<description>[...] up on my prior posts about Microsoft&#8217;s impending acquisition of FAST, they&#8217;ve now had the conference [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up on my prior posts about Microsoft&#8217;s impending acquisition of FAST, they&#8217;ve now had the conference [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Monash</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/08/microsoft-fast-prohibition/#comment-30693</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/08/microsoft-fast-prohibition/#comment-30693</guid>
		<description>The conference call has now started, and Jeff Raikes is positioning FAST clearly as enterprise search, integrated w/ SharePoint.   $5000/knowledge-worker/year spent looking for misplaced info (not just pure text) and so on.

CAM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The conference call has now started, and Jeff Raikes is positioning FAST clearly as enterprise search, integrated w/ SharePoint.   $5000/knowledge-worker/year spent looking for misplaced info (not just pure text) and so on.</p>
<p>CAM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Culler</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/08/microsoft-fast-prohibition/#comment-30692</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Culler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2008/01/08/microsoft-fast-prohibition/#comment-30692</guid>
		<description>My guess is that, as we speak, Microsoft is furiously looking through that contract and looking for the word &#039;Internet&#039; rather than &#039;web&#039;. I assume that they will start with subsuming the FAST search product and positioning it as an Enterprise search tool behind the veneer of Office 2007 or $harePoint server (Enterprise Edition, of course); they&#039;ll eventually digest the product and add the functionality to Windows Live Search, and hold Yahoo! off with a lawyer&#039;s fist (clenching a wallet, of course.)

- Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is that, as we speak, Microsoft is furiously looking through that contract and looking for the word &#8216;Internet&#8217; rather than &#8216;web&#8217;. I assume that they will start with subsuming the FAST search product and positioning it as an Enterprise search tool behind the veneer of Office 2007 or $harePoint server (Enterprise Edition, of course); they&#8217;ll eventually digest the product and add the functionality to Windows Live Search, and hold Yahoo! off with a lawyer&#8217;s fist (clenching a wallet, of course.)</p>
<p>- Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

