<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The text mining vendors continue to lack constructive vision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/12/18/the-text-mining-vendors-continue-to-lack-constructive-vision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/12/18/the-text-mining-vendors-continue-to-lack-constructive-vision/</link>
	<description>Understanding technology ... in both senses of the phrase</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:32:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Scout Labs - yet more public-facing sentiment analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/12/18/the-text-mining-vendors-continue-to-lack-constructive-vision/#comment-29079</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Scout Labs - yet more public-facing sentiment analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/12/18/the-text-mining-vendors-continue-to-lack-constructive-vision/#comment-29079</guid>
		<description>[...] Labs sounds like even more of what I was thinking of than Summize.  It&#8217;s a shame that the &#8220;traditional&#8221; text mining vendors didn&#8217;t get there [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Labs sounds like even more of what I was thinking of than Summize.  It&#8217;s a shame that the &#8220;traditional&#8221; text mining vendors didn&#8217;t get there [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

