<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nice new phrase &#8212; Voice of the Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/10/05/nice-new-phrase-voice-of-the-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/10/05/nice-new-phrase-voice-of-the-market/</link>
	<description>Understanding technology ... in both senses of the phrase</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:21:09 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seth Grimes</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/10/05/nice-new-phrase-voice-of-the-market/#comment-26785</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Grimes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/10/05/nice-new-phrase-voice-of-the-market/#comment-26785</guid>
		<description>Curt, I came across this entry while writing a VOTC article for my BI Network text analytics channel.  I see Voice of the Market a bit differently.  The easiest way to explain is by stating that markets are collections of customers and prospects.  VOTC focuses individual customers (and perhaps classes of customers, a.k.a. segments), while VOTM takes an aggregate look at larger groupings.  That is, VOTM is about collective rather than individual voices.

In terms of outcomes, VOTC might predict a particular purchase or a cancellation while VOTM would look at larger predictive models and trends.  VOTC would use the communications and records generated in one individual&#039;s transactions while VOTM would aggregate individuals&#039; communications and records and also tap those non-transactional, non-operational sources.

As I see it, VOTM is essentially Voice of the Collective Customer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curt, I came across this entry while writing a VOTC article for my BI Network text analytics channel.  I see Voice of the Market a bit differently.  The easiest way to explain is by stating that markets are collections of customers and prospects.  VOTC focuses individual customers (and perhaps classes of customers, a.k.a. segments), while VOTM takes an aggregate look at larger groupings.  That is, VOTM is about collective rather than individual voices.</p>
<p>In terms of outcomes, VOTC might predict a particular purchase or a cancellation while VOTM would look at larger predictive models and trends.  VOTC would use the communications and records generated in one individual&#8217;s transactions while VOTM would aggregate individuals&#8217; communications and records and also tap those non-transactional, non-operational sources.</p>
<p>As I see it, VOTM is essentially Voice of the Collective Customer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Text mining applications as per Attensity and Clarabridge</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/10/05/nice-new-phrase-voice-of-the-market/#comment-22253</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Text mining applications as per Attensity and Clarabridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 03:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/10/05/nice-new-phrase-voice-of-the-market/#comment-22253</guid>
		<description>[...] allied with Voice of the Customer, and also hot, is Voice of the Market and/or more direct competitive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] allied with Voice of the Customer, and also hot, is Voice of the Market and/or more direct competitive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
