<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (A little) more on Business Objects/Inxight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/23/a-little-more-on-business-objectsinxight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/23/a-little-more-on-business-objectsinxight/</link>
	<description>Understanding technology ... in both senses of the phrase</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; The case for Inxight Awareness Server</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/23/a-little-more-on-business-objectsinxight/#comment-16318</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; The case for Inxight Awareness Server</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 03:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/23/a-little-more-on-business-objectsinxight/#comment-16318</guid>
		<description>[...] been pretty skeptical about Inxight&#8217;s Awareness Server. My theory is that ordinary enterprise search engines can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been pretty skeptical about Inxight&#8217;s Awareness Server. My theory is that ordinary enterprise search engines can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Insight into Inxight</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/23/a-little-more-on-business-objectsinxight/#comment-12241</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Insight into Inxight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/23/a-little-more-on-business-objectsinxight/#comment-12241</guid>
		<description>[...] Basically, I still think what I thought before. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Basically, I still think what I thought before. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Monash</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/23/a-little-more-on-business-objectsinxight/#comment-9534</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Monash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 17:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/23/a-little-more-on-business-objectsinxight/#comment-9534</guid>
		<description>Hi Catherine!

Well, I had little doubt that you had your own relevancy ranking system.

What I have much more doubt about is whether it is really competitive with, say, what FAST offers in that regard, to name a leading enterprise search vendor.

But I'd gladly be briefed on it.  At the Text Analytics Summit, perhaps?

CAM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Catherine!</p>
<p>Well, I had little doubt that you had your own relevancy ranking system.</p>
<p>What I have much more doubt about is whether it is really competitive with, say, what FAST offers in that regard, to name a leading enterprise search vendor.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;d gladly be briefed on it.  At the Text Analytics Summit, perhaps?</p>
<p>CAM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Inxight &#8212; value in the patents?</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/23/a-little-more-on-business-objectsinxight/#comment-9518</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Inxight &#8212; value in the patents?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 12:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/23/a-little-more-on-business-objectsinxight/#comment-9518</guid>
		<description>[...] on the wrong end of an injunction vs. Informatica. If there&#8217;s any way that BOBJ&#8217;s Inxight acquisition can induce Informatica to cross-license, it could pay for itself right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the wrong end of an injunction vs. Informatica. If there&#8217;s any way that BOBJ&#8217;s Inxight acquisition can induce Informatica to cross-license, it could pay for itself right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine H van Zuylen</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/23/a-little-more-on-business-objectsinxight/#comment-9347</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine H van Zuylen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 00:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/05/23/a-little-more-on-business-objectsinxight/#comment-9347</guid>
		<description>Actually, our federated search product, Awareness Server, *does* re-rank for relevance using its own relevancy scoring system. It provides that all-important first step in Inxight's acquire-extract-store-cleanse-visualize process.

We (Inxight) are very excited about this merger. You can't have "business intelligence" without taking into account the 85% of information trapped in unstructured text. And you can't have an "information access" solution (as Gartner classifies it) without taking into account the 15% of information that is structured.

Stay tuned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, our federated search product, Awareness Server, *does* re-rank for relevance using its own relevancy scoring system. It provides that all-important first step in Inxight&#8217;s acquire-extract-store-cleanse-visualize process.</p>
<p>We (Inxight) are very excited about this merger. You can&#8217;t have &#8220;business intelligence&#8221; without taking into account the 85% of information trapped in unstructured text. And you can&#8217;t have an &#8220;information access&#8221; solution (as Gartner classifies it) without taking into account the 15% of information that is structured.</p>
<p>Stay tuned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.144 seconds -->
