<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is DMOZ the cure to Wikipedia&#8217;s spam problem?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/02/07/dmoz-cure-wikipedia-spam-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/02/07/dmoz-cure-wikipedia-spam-problem/</link>
	<description>Understanding technology ... in both senses of the phrase</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:11:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/02/07/dmoz-cure-wikipedia-spam-problem/#comment-148107</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/02/07/dmoz-cure-wikipedia-spam-problem/#comment-148107</guid>
		<description>The biggest problem with using DMOZ to filter links is that the same people who corrupt DMOZ with biased listings are exactly the kind of editors you&#039;re trying to avoid in Wikipedia. Those unethical enough to try to plant links in Wikipedia are the very same people who have made DMOZ so unreliable, in other words. Turning Wikipedia into DMOZ-on-stilts is something we need to avoid if Wikipedia is to remain relatively uncorrupted in a way that DMOZ did not avoid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest problem with using DMOZ to filter links is that the same people who corrupt DMOZ with biased listings are exactly the kind of editors you&#8217;re trying to avoid in Wikipedia. Those unethical enough to try to plant links in Wikipedia are the very same people who have made DMOZ so unreliable, in other words. Turning Wikipedia into DMOZ-on-stilts is something we need to avoid if Wikipedia is to remain relatively uncorrupted in a way that DMOZ did not avoid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhys</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/02/07/dmoz-cure-wikipedia-spam-problem/#comment-8366</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 09:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/02/07/dmoz-cure-wikipedia-spam-problem/#comment-8366</guid>
		<description>Mapping only dmoz to wiki would in effect kill off large sections of wiki from having infomative outgoing links.

The majority of dmoz editors do amazing work. However there are two problems, firstly the apparent time lag to get listed, and two, self promotion / bias by a small minority of editors.

Keep dmoz out of the equation until its teething problems are ironed out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mapping only dmoz to wiki would in effect kill off large sections of wiki from having infomative outgoing links.</p>
<p>The majority of dmoz editors do amazing work. However there are two problems, firstly the apparent time lag to get listed, and two, self promotion / bias by a small minority of editors.</p>
<p>Keep dmoz out of the equation until its teething problems are ironed out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. B.</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/02/07/dmoz-cure-wikipedia-spam-problem/#comment-4817</link>
		<dc:creator>A. B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/02/07/dmoz-cure-wikipedia-spam-problem/#comment-4817</guid>
		<description>As a Wikipedia editor, my workaround for the category mapping issue is to link to a DMOZ search results page. If I want a DMOZ link from the &quot;neutronic widgets&quot; article on Wkipedia and DMOZ doesn&#039;t have such a page, I&#039;ll search DMOZ for &quot;neutronic widgets&quot; then link to the search results page, which may show multiple DMOZ categories.

Wikipedia, while robust, is ever shifting. Articles are renamed and categories revised.

User:A. B. on Wikipedia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Wikipedia editor, my workaround for the category mapping issue is to link to a DMOZ search results page. If I want a DMOZ link from the &#8220;neutronic widgets&#8221; article on Wkipedia and DMOZ doesn&#8217;t have such a page, I&#8217;ll search DMOZ for &#8220;neutronic widgets&#8221; then link to the search results page, which may show multiple DMOZ categories.</p>
<p>Wikipedia, while robust, is ever shifting. Articles are renamed and categories revised.</p>
<p>User:A. B. on Wikipedia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XODP Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/02/07/dmoz-cure-wikipedia-spam-problem/#comment-4715</link>
		<dc:creator>XODP Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/02/07/dmoz-cure-wikipedia-spam-problem/#comment-4715</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Linking Wikipedia Articles to ODP/dMOZ Categories&lt;/strong&gt;

A truly open Web directory would be a great companion to Wikipedia, but linking a Wikipedia article to ODP and eliminating all other outbound links from that article will create many more problems than it will solve, a fortiori when one considers the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Linking Wikipedia Articles to ODP/dMOZ Categories</strong></p>
<p>A truly open Web directory would be a great companion to Wikipedia, but linking a Wikipedia article to ODP and eliminating all other outbound links from that article will create many more problems than it will solve, a fortiori when one considers the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost de Valk</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/02/07/dmoz-cure-wikipedia-spam-problem/#comment-4004</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost de Valk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 08:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2007/02/07/dmoz-cure-wikipedia-spam-problem/#comment-4004</guid>
		<description>We need a DMOZ 2.0 anyhow so I thought we&#039;d solve two things at once :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need a DMOZ 2.0 anyhow so I thought we&#8217;d solve two things at once <img src='http://www.texttechnologies.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

