<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Procter &amp; Gamble on text mining projects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2006/06/24/procter-gamble-on-text-mining-projects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2006/06/24/procter-gamble-on-text-mining-projects/</link>
	<description>Understanding technology ... in both senses of the phrase</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:11:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Text mining - fact and fiction</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2006/06/24/procter-gamble-on-text-mining-projects/#comment-29374</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Text mining - fact and fiction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 22:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2006/06/24/procter-gamble-on-text-mining-projects/#comment-29374</guid>
		<description>[...] of known computational linguists working for end-user organizations, worldwide, was precisely 1, at Procter &amp; Gamble. (Intelligence agencies excepted, of course.) I&#8217;d guess it&#8217;s higher now, but I probably [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of known computational linguists working for end-user organizations, worldwide, was precisely 1, at Procter &amp; Gamble. (Intelligence agencies excepted, of course.) I&#8217;d guess it&#8217;s higher now, but I probably [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Introduction to ClearForest</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2006/06/24/procter-gamble-on-text-mining-projects/#comment-1554</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Introduction to ClearForest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2006/06/24/procter-gamble-on-text-mining-projects/#comment-1554</guid>
		<description>[...] ClearForest is one of the two companies whose name comes up for fact extraction applications, probably even a little ahead of Attensity. Their flagship account is the GM deal they did with IBM, kicking off the whole warranty report mining boom. Procter &amp; Gamble is no slouch of a customer either. They’re involved enough in anti-terrorism that, when I asked Jay if he knew who Cogito was, he said “Of course.” And apparently one of their techie founders is the guy who coined the term “text mining” in the first place. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ClearForest is one of the two companies whose name comes up for fact extraction applications, probably even a little ahead of Attensity. Their flagship account is the GM deal they did with IBM, kicking off the whole warranty report mining boom. Procter &#38; Gamble is no slouch of a customer either. They’re involved enough in anti-terrorism that, when I asked Jay if he knew who Cogito was, he said “Of course.” And apparently one of their techie founders is the guy who coined the term “text mining” in the first place. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

