<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four (at least) issues in text and taxonomy federation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2006/06/10/four-at-least-issues-in-text-and-taxonomy-federation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2006/06/10/four-at-least-issues-in-text-and-taxonomy-federation/</link>
	<description>Understanding technology ... in both senses of the phrase</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:32:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should ontology management be open sourced? &#124; Text Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2006/06/10/four-at-least-issues-in-text-and-taxonomy-federation/#comment-42185</link>
		<dc:creator>Should ontology management be open sourced? &#124; Text Technologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 09:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/2006/06/10/four-at-least-issues-in-text-and-taxonomy-federation/#comment-42185</guid>
		<description>[...] invention. And there’s a lot of invention still to be done here, especially in the area of taxonomy federation. Could there be an open source business model in which the vendor gives away the code and sells [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] invention. And there’s a lot of invention still to be done here, especially in the area of taxonomy federation. Could there be an open source business model in which the vendor gives away the code and sells [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

