<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The text technologies market 1:   It should be huge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texttechnologies.com/2005/12/09/the-text-technologies-market-1-it-should-be-huge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2005/12/09/the-text-technologies-market-1-it-should-be-huge/</link>
	<description>Understanding technology ... in both senses of the phrase</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:35:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; How the text technologies market could ignite</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2005/12/09/the-text-technologies-market-1-it-should-be-huge/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monash Report&#187;Blog Archive &#187; How the text technologies market could ignite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/?p=8#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] Over on the Text Technologies blog, I have a series of posts arguing that the potentially huge market for enterprise text technologies is being stifled by the lack of a general-purpose ontology management system. I further argue that such a product could be constructed in such a way as to be actually usable and potentially adopted by mainstream enterprises (no, you don&#8217;t need a trained librarian to use it). So what are the chances of something like this actually working out, to an industry-changing extent? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Over on the Text Technologies blog, I have a series of posts arguing that the potentially huge market for enterprise text technologies is being stifled by the lack of a general-purpose ontology management system. I further argue that such a product could be constructed in such a way as to be actually usable and potentially adopted by mainstream enterprises (no, you don&#8217;t need a trained librarian to use it). So what are the chances of something like this actually working out, to an industry-changing extent? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; The text technologies market 3: Here&#8217;s what&#8217;s missing</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2005/12/09/the-text-technologies-market-1-it-should-be-huge/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; The text technologies market 3: Here&#8217;s what&#8217;s missing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 06:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/?p=8#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] The text technologies market should be booming, but actually is in disarray. How, then, do I think it should be fixed? I think the key problem can be summed up like this: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The text technologies market should be booming, but actually is in disarray. How, then, do I think it should be fixed? I think the key problem can be summed up like this: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; The text technologies market 2: It&#8217;s actually in disarray</title>
		<link>http://www.texttechnologies.com/2005/12/09/the-text-technologies-market-1-it-should-be-huge/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Technologies&#187;Blog Archive &#187; The text technologies market 2: It&#8217;s actually in disarray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 22:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texttechnologies.com/?p=8#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] The text technologies market should be huge and thriving. Actually, however, it&#8217;s in disarray. Multiple generations of enterprise search vendors have floundered, with the Autonomy/Verity merger being basically a combination of the weak. The RDBMS vendors came up with decent hybrid tabular/text offerings, and almost nobody cared. (Admittedly, part of the reason for that is that the best offering was Oracle&#8217;s, and Oracle almost always screws up its ancillary businesses. Email searchability has been ridiculously bad since &#8212; well, since the invention of email. And speech technology has floundered for decades, with most of the survivors now rolled into the new version of Nuance. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The text technologies market should be huge and thriving. Actually, however, it&#8217;s in disarray. Multiple generations of enterprise search vendors have floundered, with the Autonomy/Verity merger being basically a combination of the weak. The RDBMS vendors came up with decent hybrid tabular/text offerings, and almost nobody cared. (Admittedly, part of the reason for that is that the best offering was Oracle&#8217;s, and Oracle almost always screws up its ancillary businesses. Email searchability has been ridiculously bad since &#8212; well, since the invention of email. And speech technology has floundered for decades, with most of the survivors now rolled into the new version of Nuance. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.179 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-01-28 00:43:06 -->
